Art Keller’s psychological isolation and marital estrangement
The Power of the DogArt Keller’s psychological isolation and marital estrangement take shape after he returns from Mexico, turning the pressures of his work into a private rupture that he cannot explain to his family. He withdraws from Althea Keller and their children even while remaining physically present, and the distance persists through investigations, successive desk assignments, and the collapse of the marriage. The defining image is not simply silence between spouses, but an invisible barrier Art experiences within himself: he wants closeness, yet cannot reach the people waiting on the other side of it.
Return from Mexico and withdrawal
Althea Keller remembers that Art had already seemed remote during their final months in Guadalajara, but describes that period as a honeymoon by comparison with the man who came back. He does not want to talk or listen. Much of his long administrative leave passes in solitude: sitting by her parents’ pool, taking long walks through Pacific Palisades, or going down to the beach alone. At dinner he says little; at other times he launches into angry denunciations of politics, then leaves for the upstairs room or another nocturnal walk. The repeated departures make withdrawal a routine rather than a single quarrel.
Their intimacy also changes. On the increasingly rare occasions when they make love, Althea experiences Art as aggressive and hurried, as if he were discharging anger instead of expressing affection or desire. Afterward, his depression compounds the estrangement. When she tells him she feels treated like a punching bag, he answers that he has never hit her; her response makes clear that she is describing something other than physical violence. The exchange exposes a failure of understanding as well as a failure of tenderness: Art answers the literal accusation, while Althea is trying to name the emotional force of their encounters.
Family life and the barrier within
Art continues to perform the duties of fatherhood. He takes the children to the park, shows Michael how to body-board, and plays tennis with Cassie. Yet Althea sees these familiar activities as mechanical, as though a robotic version of Art were carrying them out. The children notice the change too. His presence in family routines therefore does not undo his absence from family life; the outward gestures remain while the warmth that once gave them meaning has receded.
Althea tries to persuade him to see someone, but he dismisses the suggestion by objecting that a therapist would only give him drugs. Her frustrated thought that he should take them registers how little access she has to him, not evidence that he receives treatment. Art’s own account of the distance is more complicated than simple unwillingness: he wants to tell her everything and become close again, but experiences an internal force field he cannot break through. He imagines himself moving underwater, able to see his wife and children through distorted faces but unable to reach up and touch them—or let them touch him. The image gives form to a separation that exists inside him as well as between him and his family. Instead of crossing it, he retreats further into silence, which the narrative presents as a slow poison to the marriage.
Investigations and the years in the desert
The subpoenas intensify a condition already established at home. Art faces meetings with Drug Enforcement Administration bureaucrats, administration officials, congressional investigators, and a succession of lawyers. Althea fears that legal fees will bankrupt the family, but Art tells her not to worry and says the matter is taken care of. She never learns where the money comes from and never sees a legal bill. The practical reassurance does not become emotional openness: when she pleads that she is his wife and asks why he will not confide in her, he says there are things she cannot know.
Art later calls 1987, 1988, and 1989 his years in the desert. The phrase gathers together the investigations he maneuvers through, the perjury indictment he fears but that never arrives, and the political transition from one president to the vice president who had run the secret war against the Sandinistas. Professionally, he is moved from one desk job to another. At home, the marriage dries up: he and Althea retreat into separate rooms and separate lives. The public scrutiny and the secrecy surrounding his work coincide with the intimate breakdown, but the account keeps their connection precise: Art’s refusal to discuss matters with Althea leaves her shut out just as the investigations press in on him.
Separation and unresolved ending
Althea eventually demands a divorce, and Art fights her at every step. His resistance is expressed in a stark warning that he will never let her take the children. It stands in sharp contrast to the earlier image of a father dutifully taking them to the park or teaching Michael to body-board: care remains, but now it is bound up with conflict and the prospect of losing his family. The marriage has moved from strained silence to an explicit contest over separation and the children.
Even after those years, the divorce remains unfinished in the scene’s present. A fresh set of papers sits unsigned on the kitchenette table of Art’s barren little apartment in downtown San Diego. The papers make the estrangement concrete: the couple’s separation has reached the point of legal documents, but Art has not signed them. The account then says that peace eventually came without specifying what form it took or resolving the status of the papers. That limited ending preserves the tension between the possibility of peace and the prolonged damage of a marriage in which Art could neither disclose what he carried nor accept separation easily.